The Existence Of God Essay -- essays research papers

The Existence of godThe existence of a deity has for generations been the topic of fiercedebate. This most usually occurring between members of the religious societyand, everybody else. As a matter of fact the religious land itself has nonalways been able to agree on God. This has resulted in many an(prenominal) a holy man to shamup the fight for his deity through the realm of words. Many theories give birth beenproposed, and all think that theirs proves beyond a doubt on whether or non Godexists. To economise this paper I read four of those theories by assorted workforce ofthe cloth, who all attempt to make the stock for a God in the Christian sense.The foremost of the theories I looked at was that of St.Anslem ofCanterbury. He supplies the ontological argument for the existence of God. Theontological argument states that by understanding the nature of God himself, wecome to realize he exists. He explains this argument by graduation exercise defining what Godis. Anslem says that God is a being than which vigor greater can be conceivedto exist, that it can not even be con facial expressionred not to exist. In short, the factthat said being can not be considered not to exist, would on that pointby make itgreater than any that could be considered not to exist. This would in allreality be the secret to Gods omnipotence in Anlsems eyes. other point thathe stresses is that just be understanding the concept of what a God is, you areproving his existence. This is because if you understand who God is, you canalso get hold of his existence, and therefore cannot conceive that he does not exist.Therefore making him that which nothing greater can be conceived of, and whichcannot be conceived not to exist which we have already defined as God.The second argument for a God comes from St. Tomas Aquinas, who arguesfor the cosmological point of view. The cosmological argument states that allthings in this founding have a cause, and since these causes cannot go on forever there must be a first cause, i.e. God. He argues that there are 5 waysto argue for the existence of God, the first is the argument from head. Thisstates that everything in this earthly concern has certain potentials for motion. It alsostates that for these potentials to be met another object n motion must set offsaid potential. That object in turn back would have ... ...ad and the point would be moot.So by looking at these paths Pascal decided to look at the risks of eachwager. In the first you get infinite rewards from only one life of believing.Plus he matte that you also probably had a fulfilling and enjoyable life too. Sothe first, can be looked at as a clear win situation in which you risked verylittle, and won much. The second and fourth possibilities did not reallyconcern Pascal much because by thinking of it in terms of odds, neither seemedprobable, and again wouldnt matter anyhow because you would no perennial exist.The third possibility however, in whi ch you could end up in hell, seemed to wait onpersuade Pascal into believing in a God. He felt that for the amount you had tolose in this situation, no intelligent human would take the risk. So inconclusion, Pascal came to believe that believing in a God was a safe bet, inthat it had the least risk with the highest returns.As for myself, after reading these papers I find myself tending to sidewith Pascal the most. I dont think that a little insurance could hurt, becauseuntil there is proof otherwise none of us really know.