Leaders of the Civil Rights Movement

In Martin Luther Kings lyric he speaks with such heating and determination, you can tell in his join that he means everything he says and his try for reaches kayoed to tidy sum and the way he emphases his words captures the audiences attention. He believed that every person should be fitted despite their skin color. In Malcolm Xs row he talks to a greater extent or so himself and he thought it would be beat out for everyone to keep their religion to themselves. He believed that the unappeasable heap were trapped by the color people.He thought of dust coat people as the enemy and he generally spoke negatively about them. He made jokes throughout his speech and to me he didnt sound at solid as Martin Luther. For example Martin said vehe handsce as a way of achieving racial justice is both meshuggener and libertine. It is impractical because it is a desc expiry spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to gangrene the opponent rather than w in his misgiving it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. As opposed to Malcolm X, who stated in his speech There is nothing in our book, the Koran, which teaches us to suffer imperturbablely. Our religion teaches us to be intelligent. Be nonaggressive, be courteous, obey the law, remark everyone unless if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery. Thats a good religion. Dr. Martin Luther King, jr. wanted a more peaceful approach. He hoped that with sit-ins and peace marches to woo to the compositionls of dignity and justice in the white people of the time.To show them the wrong they were doing so that they would want to correct it in themselves out of their own personal honor. Malcolm X on the other hand believed that white people would never give up their power, at least early on in his career as a accomplished rights leader. He believed they would only give it up if forced to do so, a nd that meant through private-enterprise(a) means. He eventually give this idea up in favor of more peaceful means after determination white Muslims who treated him and other scorch men as brothers and black men who treated white people as brothers as well.And with this he began to realize that they could move in peace, and so he switched to a more peaceful style in his protests in the end. Personally, I believe that Martin Luthers approach to gaining equality among people worked best. When fetching a forceful approach, such as Malcolm Xs you take a risk that your enemy will not fear you but that they could perchance fighting back and over power you. This could possibly be said for a peaceful approach as well but its less likely.